What a maker calls assistance, and what they call self-driving, are different levels. Most of what's actually on the road still wants a person watching. After a crash, the wheel, the brakes, and whether the system asked the person to take over all get used on that question. A claim against the maker is a different case. It needs a defect you can point at, not a slogan.
The policy may put a self-driving mode that's still a test, or use that ignores the manual, into what it won't pay. Read that before anything happens. Afterward, keep the log and the version number. I'm not going to call one brand the one at fault.
What you can do first
- 01Keep the screen or the log from just before and just after. Don't factory-reset it.
- 02Search the policy for automatic, assistance, and testing.
- 03What you ask of the maker, and what you pay the person on the road, stay in different letters.
Related text. The link leaves this site for the official database or the agency.
Rewritten in my own words. Not a judgment and not a law firm's article. If a number shows up, it belonged to that public discussion, not to you. Check the Judicial Yuan judgment system. These started as public discussions of car crashes. I rewrote them here. Not a law firm's article.
I'm not a lawyer, and I'm not a mediator. I can't decide this for you. The statute that counts is the one still in force. Judgments live on the Judicial Yuan site.