Skip to content

The table and what comes after · 2026-08

The preliminary table says there was a cause. That is not a decision that you have to pay.

The police analysis, the appraisal, the review of that appraisal, and a judgment. Four papers, and they don't weigh the same.

The preliminary table says there was a cause. That is not a decision that you have to pay.
A picture of the kind of moment. Not a photo from that case.

The preliminary analysis table records the violations the police saw at the time. It is not a civil percentage, and it is not a criminal conviction. Insurers often start the talking from it. The talking can still move.

The vehicle-accident appraisal, and the review of it, are opinions from people who do that work. A court can still set them aside. What actually sticks is a judgment, or the settlement you signed. Three mistakes people make: a listed cause means fully at fault, not being written down means you did nothing wrong, one appraisal ends it. None of those is true.

The police analysis, the appraisal, the review of that appraisal, and a judgment. Four papers, and they don't weigh the same.
A picture of the kind of moment. Not a photo from that case.

What you can do first

  1. 01Copy every column, including your own violation.
  2. 02If you don't accept it, then talk about an appraisal. The deadline is on the notice. I won't count it.
  3. 03Don't write the table's percentage into a settlement unless you actually accept it.

Related text. The link leaves this site for the official database or the agency.

Rewritten in my own words. Not a judgment and not a law firm's article. If a number shows up, it belonged to that public discussion, not to you. Check the Judicial Yuan judgment system. These started as public discussions of car crashes. I rewrote them here. Not a law firm's article.

I'm not a lawyer, and I'm not a mediator. I can't decide this for you. The statute that counts is the one still in force. Judgments live on the Judicial Yuan site.